Posts Tagged ‘Report Card’
Trenton’s 2018 Report Card
We’ve got a new Mayor and a new City Council. They obviously haven’t had a chance to do much but then again none of them have expressed any desire to meet any goal around the 5 measures listed annually in this report card.
The 2018 Report Card will tell us whether or not the Jackson administration actually did move the needle as Mayor Gusciora’s campaign team has claimed.
All five of the following are “lagging” indicators, meaning they represent the past, but they are objective and widely used measurements collected in a consistent way across the state and nation. There’s no hand-waving with these numbers.
- Crime levels as measured by the Uniform Crime Report
- Population growth as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau (in the case of Trenton, every year)
- Graduation rate as measured by the NJ Department of Education
- Median Household Income as measured by the U.S. Census, and
- Economic success as measured by our Tax Base
Crime is down a bit but we had more murders
The 2017 Uniform Crime Report represents last year’s crime
- Uniform Crime Reports for 2017 are 3276
- This is a decrease from 2016 of 1.1%
- Murders were up from 21 in 2016 to 23 in 2017
Trenton held basically holding the rate steady, though Trentonians have become more murderous over the years. TPD cleared 15% of its cases in 2017 which compares favourably to Newark (9%) but unfavourably to Hamilton (31%). Our crime is still much than the state average but for not getting too much worse I give Trenton a C in 2017.
Source: NJ State Police
Trenton gained a little population
Trenton’s 2017 census estimate is 84,964 residents. This is a 1.1% increase from 2016’s population of 84,056 and flat since 2010.
This number is up, a little. So that’s good. New Jersey as a whole gained 2.4% in population since 2010 meaning that Trenton is not keeping pace.
For turning this thing around for the first time (since I’ve been tracking), Trenton gets an C.
Source: US Census Bureau
Graduation rates have go up!
The Trenton school district’s 2017 graduation rate was 70.14%. This is a good uptick from 2016’s rate of 66.55% and 2015’s rate of 68.63% and a huge improvement over 2014’s 52%
70% isn’t great BUT it’s a big improvement and indicates that something is happening. Perhaps not having the old Trenton Central High building has stirred things up.
Hamilton and Ewing School Districts hover around 90% graduation rate so maybe it’s possible to get there. Who knows, maybe the new school will make a difference.
Because the trend is up over several years, Trenton gets an C.
Source: NJ Dept. of Education
Incomes in Trenton stayed flat
Median Household Incomes in Trenton grew slightly to $34.415 (2016 numbers) from $34,257 (2015). These are very low numbers and show why it is that housing prices aren’t growing. Furthermore, 27.6% of people in Trenton live in poverty.
New Jersey’s median household income is more than double Trenton’s at $73,702 over double Trenton’s income.
For having stagnant and very low incomes in one of the wealthiest states in the country, Trenton gets an F.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Tax Base is up a lot
Trenton doesn’t maintain a current publicly available tax list, so I’ve to use the Dept. of Community Affairs web site. It gives our tax base as $2,395,945,829 for year end 2017. This is up almost $400,000,000 from 2016 and represents an 18% increase. Quite frankly this is a big number and must be the result of the revaluation.
As a comparison, Hamilton’s tax base is over $8.5B and tiny Princeton’s is over $7B.
$2.4B in tax base isn’t enough to support Trenton by a long shot but it’s a big improvement even if it just reflects getting our tax rates somewhat straightened out. For at least showing a bigger number, I give Trenton an C.
Source: Department of Community Affairs
Did the Jackson administration move the needle? … Almost!
- The Education numbers are promising, the crime rate is down and our tax base has been overhauled
- Going strictly by the numbers, I’d say the needle moved. However, its likely we didn’t see real investment of $400M in Trenton, just real revalution.
If a Mayor and City Council really were interested in progress they would highlight these 5 numbers in every meeting, every State of the City and with the State. Every dollar spent would be to improve the numbers year over year. Instead, for the 18th year in a row (since I’ve lived in Trenton) all I get from our government is hand waving.
Trenton’s 2017 Report Card
Governor Christie is trying to throw a lot of money at Trenton. Notably he wants to build an $18M pedestrian bridge from the Capitol building to the Delaware River. This report highlights the city’s progress (or lack thereof) in 5 basic measurements. One has to ask whether that kind of investment will move the needle in improving any of these important measures.
It’s not enough, to say we did something, or are working on something or want something to happen. Rather, the results are what matter.
All five of the following are “lagging” indicators, meaning they represent the past, but they are objective and widely used measurements collected in a consistent way across the state and nation. There’s no hand-waving with these numbers.
- Crime levels as measured by the Uniform Crime Report
- Population growth as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau (in the case of Trenton, every year)
- Graduation rate as measured by the NJ Department of Education
- Median Household Income as measured by the U.S. Census, and
- Economic success as measured by our Tax Base
Crime is up and so were murders
The 2016 Uniform Crime Report represents last year’s crime
- Uniform Crime Reports for 2016 are 3313
- This is an increase from 2015 of 8.7%
- Murders were up from 17 in 2015 to 21 in 2016
Holding the rate steady would give the City a C, but since the both the murder rate and crime index increased I’m giving it a D.
Source: NJ State Police
Trenton is losing population
Trenton’s 2016 census estimate is 84,056 residents. This is a 1% decrease from 2010’s population of 84,913.
You can’t revitalize a city by losing population. It implies that our economy is shrinking, we’re not a desirable place to live and that our property values are going down. New Jersey as a whole is gaining population at a 1.7% rate.
For continuing to lose population in growing state for the 4th year in a row (since I’ve been tracking), Trenton gets an F.
Source: US Census Bureau
Graduation rates have declined
The Trenton school district’s 2016 graduation rate was 66.55%. This is a slide backwards over 2015’s rate of 68.63% which had been a big improvement over the year before.
Just about 2/3 of Trenton kids are graduating now. But still 1/3 don’t graduate high school which is appalling and continues to explain the high level of lawlessness in the city.
The State of NJ is spending a fortune on a new school but I’ll guess it won’t fix our problems. We also have a new superintendent but Trenton is a bit of a revolving door in that regard. One of these days Trentonians will do the right thing and lobby for school choice, county-wide integration or both.
Because we slid backwards, Trenton gets an D.
Source: NJ Dept. of Education
Incomes in Trenton are down yet again
Median Household Incomes in Trenton are down again to $34.257 (2015 numbers) from $35,647 (2014). These are the latest numbers we have but represent a disturbing trend in Trenton. Not only are we losing people, but evidently, we’re losing higher income people. Furthermore, 28% of people in Trenton live in poverty.
New Jersey’s median household income is more than double Trenton’s at $72,093.
For having shrinking incomes, a 4th year in a row in a wealthy state, Trenton gets an F.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Tax Base is up a bit
Trenton doesn’t maintain a current publicly available tax list, so I’ve to use the Dept. of Community Affairs web site. It gives our tax base as $2,022,437,610 (just over$2B) for 2016. This is up from the $1,996,653,658 I reported last year. The number includes properties with abatements and PILOTs so I think its likely indicative.
It’s tough to say whether this inconsistent reporting is really indicative of $22M in new investment. However, I do know that $2B is enough of a tax base to support the city and we need something like four times the tax base to pay for our municipal and school budgets. We have a long way to go and not too many projects in the pipeline.
As a comparison, Hamilton’s tax base is over $5B and tiny Princeton’s is over $6B.
For a tax base that at least isn’t shrinking but will nonetheless lead to higher taxes I give Trenton an D.
Source: Department of Community Affairs
Is the city turning around? Not yet!
- The numbers are about the same as last year
- If you believe numbers don’t lie then we’re not really improving
If a Mayor and City Council really were interested in progress they would highlight these 5 numbers in every meeting, every State of the City and with the State. Every dollar spent would be to improve the numbers year over year. Instead, for the 17th year in a row (since I’ve lived in Trenton) all I get from our government is hand waving.
Trenton’s 2016 Report Card
Mayor Jackson gave his state of the city address last night. He highlighted quite a few things the city is doing and congratulated his staff on their hard work. What he did NOT do, nor has any Mayor of Trenton in the last 15 years done, is to give numbers that back up successful results.
Several years ago, the Fix Trenton’s Budget Committee which I led, agreed on 5 basic measures of goodness for a city. Since then I have been reporting on these indicators as an objective way to gauge our progress in Trenton. It’s not enough, to say we did something, or are working on something or want something to happen. Rather, the results are what matter.
All five of the following are “lagging” indicators, meaning they represent the past, but they are objective and widely used measurements collected in a consistent way across the state and nation. There’s no hand-waving with these numbers.
- Crime levels as measured by the Uniform Crime Report
- Population growth as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau (in the case of Trenton, every year)
- Graduation rate as measured by the NJ Department of Education
- Median Household Income as measured by the U.S. Census, and
- Economic success as measured by our Tax Base
Crime is slightly up but murders were down
The 2015Uniform Crime Report represents 18 months of Mayor Jackson’s tenure.
- Uniform Crime Reports for 2015 are 3048
- This is an increase from 2014 of 3%
- Murders were down from 32 in 2014 to 17 in 2015
Holding the rate steady would give the City a C, but since the murder rate declined so drastically I’m giving it a B.
Source: NJ State Police
Trenton is losing population
Trenton’s 2015 census estimate is 84,225 residents. This is a slight decline of from 2012’s estimate of 84,349.
Losing population is a crippling situation to be in. It implies that our economy is shrinking, we’re not a desirable place to live and that our property values are going down. Since 2010 Trenton’s population has decreased -.8% while New Jersey’s has increased 1.9%. In a growing state, Trenton is shrinking.
For continuing to lose population in growing state, Trenton gets a D.
Source: US Census Bureau
Graduation rates have improved
The Trenton school district’s 2015 graduation rate was 68.63%. This is an improvement over 2014’s dismal graduation rate of 52.95%
Just about 2/3 of Trenton kids are graduating now. That sounds better but still 1/3 don’t graduate high school which is appalling and continues to explain the high level of lawlessness in the city.
It can be argued that fixing the schools isn’t a prerequisite for revitalizing the city. The easiest target market for new residents is the millions of people without kids. However, failing schools don’t help.
For a big jump in graduation rates though, Trenton gets an A.
Source: NJ Dept. of Education
Incomes in Trenton are down again
Median Household Incomes in Trenton are down again to $35,647 (2014 numbers) from $36,662 (2013). These are the latest numbers we have but represent a disturbing trend in Trenton. Not only are we losing people, but evidently we’re losing higher income people. This is disastrous for an economy that is largely based on retail spending. Furthermore, 28% of people in Trenton live in poverty.
New Jersey’s median household income is more than double Trenton’s at $72,062.
For having shrinking incomes, a 3rd year in a row in a wealthy state, Trenton gets an F.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Tax Base is down
Trenton gets an “incomplete” on this grade as it no longer bothers to publish its tax base information on the city web site. The version published there is almost 2 years old. So I went digging for another source and found our tax base (for 2015) published on the Dept. of Community Affairs web site. It gives our tax base as $1,996,653,658 (just under $2B). This would be down from the $ 2,036,287,800 I reported last year based on the January 1, 2015 City Tax list.
As we can see the numbers are inconsistent, but since they’re all that are available, I surmise that our tax base has in fact shrunk. To fix Trenton’s budget we need to be adding roughly $100M a year in taxable properties instead we lost $40M in value.
As a comparison, Hamilton’s tax base is over $5B and tiny Princeton’s is over $6B.
For a shrinking tax base that will lead to higher taxes I give Trenton an F.
Source: Department of Community Affairs
Is the city turning around? Nope!
- We’re in pretty much the same situation we were in last year
- There are some development projects but they aren’t paying taxes yet
- People are still moving away.
That’s not progress.
Trenton’s 2015 Report Card
Mayor Jackson has been in office for a full year and the results for Trenton over that time period are promising. Yes, that’s right, I said promising.
The Mayor has been helped by a generally improving economy and a corresponding drop in crime. That said, just like we blamed Mayor Mack for the city’s decline we have to give Mayor Jackson credit for the positive shift in most of our numbers
There are five key indicators of Trenton’s health on which thoughtful people have agreed over the years. Five measurable and mostly 3rd party numbers, that show how well we’re doing. And if all five of these indicators started showing signs of improvement, all Trentonians would notice the city coming back to life. If we could see progress in these five areas we’d have hope again that would be contagious.
The indicators are all well-known statistics that are easily and regularly measured in Trenton. They are:
- Crime levels as measured by the Uniform Crime Report
- Latest data is for 2014 and include 6 months of the administrations term
- Population growth as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau (in the case of Trenton, every year)
- Latest estimate is for 2013 and therefore predates the current administration
- Graduation rate as measured by the NJ Department of Education
- Latest data is for the 2014 academic year and predates the current administration
- Median Household Income as measured by the U.S. Census, and
- Latest estimate is for 2013 and therefore predates the current administration
- Economic success as measured by our Tax Base
- Data is up to date as of mid-year 2015
The following is the 2015 Report Card:
Our economy is gaining wealth!
In 2011 Trenton’s tax base, the value of property on which we can charge a property tax, was $2,009,731,470. By 2014 it has declined to $1,993,783,800. In the last year our tax base has rebounded to $ 2,036,287,800 for 2015. This ~$40,000,000 in new or revalued ratables is a healthy 2% increase in one year.
The implications of this increase are large. At a 4.8% tax rate, that increase in ratables translates into an extra $2M for our city budget or roughly 1% of the total.
We can never have a lower tax rate or afford to spend more money on parks, police and streets unless our ratables keep going up.
Because the direction changed I give Trenton a “B” for its much needed increase in ratables. A $100M increase (the rate needed for our economy to reach escape velocity) would garner an “A”.
Our crime rate came down!
The 2014 Uniform Crime Report represents 6 months of Mayor Jackson’s tenure and the leadership of a new Police Director. It’s fair to assume that that change has helped stimulate the 14% decrease in crimes from 2013.
Uniform Crime Reports for 2014 are 2960
- This is a decrease from 2013 of 14% which shows we’re moving in the right direction,
- This is in addition to a 14% decrease from 2012 to 2013.
- Our murder rate was also down a bit from 37 to 32 last year.
There is a direct correlation between population decline and crime
In “CRIME, URBAN FLIGHT, AND THE CONSEQUENCES FOR CITIES”, economists Julie Berry Cullen and Steven D. Levitt found that each FBI index crime leads directly to one person moving out of an inner city, like Trenton. That’s bad enough but high income residents are 5 times more likely to leave due to crime than average. Families with children are 3 times more likely to leave. Finally crime rate is negatively correlated with depopulation, home values and per capita income.
If our crime rate can continue to decline and other positive stimulants are put into play, there may be hope for us yet.
Crime reduction is the 2nd bright spot in this report card and deserves an “A”.
Our people are still leaving the city
Trenton’s 2013 census estimate is 84,349 residents. This is a slight decline of from 2012’s estimate of 84,447.
- Since 2010 our population has declined by 0.7%
- Meanwhile New Jersey’s population has grown 1.4% in the same period
Relative to our neighbors, Trenton has become a less desirable place to live.
Give ourselves a C. The exodus has slowed.
It will take an influx of new residents to begin the process of rebuilding our tax base. We have room to grow. At its peak in the 1920s, Trenton housed 140,000 residents.
Our incomes are still relatively low
Trenton’s Median Household Income is $36,662 (2013). This is slightly lower than the 2012 estimate of $36,727
- This is in stark contrast to NJ’s 2013 median household income of $71,629, which is almost double that of Trenton’s.
- Hamilton’s median household income is $71,724 for 2013.
Income levels are very important to the health of a city as they determine how much money residents will spend, which in turn, determine the attractiveness of a city to retailers and other amenities. While NJ’s median household income is double that of Trenton’s, NJ’s per capita retail spending is three times our rate. This means that retail spending falls off disproportionately to income.
Making Trenton attractive to retail and entertainment business is important as the presence of those amenities makes the city attractive to new residents and businesses but we won’t get new amenities without more spending power in the city. As it stands, Trenton is a relative “non-entity” when it comes to retail spending.
Because we’re grading on a curve and Camden and Passaic are even worse off than we are, Trenton gets a “D”.
Our children are still dropping out of school
The Trenton school district’s 2014 graduation rate was 52.9%.
- This is an improvement over 2013’s dismal graduation rate of 48.6%
- This means that almost half of the students who entered 9th grade in 2009 graduated in 2013.
- There is no world in which this is healthy.
- It can be argued that fixing the schools isn’t a prerequisite for revitalizing the city. The easiest target market for new residents is the millions of people without kids. However, failing schools don’t help.
With 50% of our young adult population grossly under-educated, they are likely to become a drain on the economic future of our city. High school dropouts are more likely than graduates to turn to crime and create a social cost for the rest of us.
There’s no other grade for a city that graduates barely over 50% of its students than “F”.
This is a complicated problem
A city is a complex system. When dollars are invested in crime fighting in one part of the city, street paving may go undone in another. That lack of street paving may have a larger or smaller impact on investment in the city than the crime fighting.
Investment will lead to a higher tax base but not for some time. In the meantime, there may not be enough money to fund basic services and taxes have to be raised.
Higher taxes will devalue the investment, leading to lower than anticipated increases in the tax base.
And so it goes in any economy. 1st and 2nd order causes and effects are at play making seemingly simple policy decisions difficult. This is especially problematic in an environment where the public doesn’t appreciate the non-intuitive nature of such decision-making.
Is the city turning around?
We’ve been in a vicious cycle
- High crime led to depopulation and greater expense in policing
- Depopulation led to higher taxes which drives people away faster
- In a city where almost half of its budget is fixed on debt services and benefit obligations, our inability to fund discretionary budget items such as city services is limited
- Lack of services drives people away even faster thus creating a vicious cycle.
The data shows some promise!
A bump in our tax base, a decrease in crime and a slight increase graduation are all great. It’s been a long time since 3 of these five important indicators have actually improved.
There is also some promise in the Jackson administration.
The Jackson administration has recently released a strategic plan of sorts that highlights some areas of focus. I’ve not seen details but mostly like what I do see ( 5 things Trenton is focusing on to foster economic development).
The plan includes focus on
- Density, with good words about market rate housing and transparency for developers and some good stories about some upcoming “big” developments.
- Diversity, but what they are really talking about are small business loans for the Hispanic community,
- Quality of Life, what they’re talking about is Homesteading and getting rid of vacant properties, which is great.
- Retail, I don’t know what this focus might turn in to practically but they’re talking S. Broad St., which is great.
- Industry, is the puzzling piece. It flies in the face of reason that light industrial development makes real sense (without big subsidies) in Trenton.
All in all this is a decent report card. My prescription for Trenton after the 2014 election was to get basic government operation in order and make the 2nd year the one were big policy initiatives were unveiled. We started out rocky by operating without a budget for 9 of 12 months. Hopefully that won’t happen again and we see some meat on the bones of the above focus areas.
The 2014 Report Card: We all know Trenton is in Rough Shape