Posts Tagged ‘candidate’
Now that Mayor Mack’s future has become uncertain, to say the least, contenders are being bandied about. I plan to be even tougher with this new crop of candidates than I was in 2010. I’m tired of empty suits with empty ideas and empty promises fulfilling their ego at the people of Trenton’s expense. I can’t afford it anymore.
This article is meant to establish a starting point for the candidates. It represents our state as a city. The candidates will do well to express their plans in terms of goals for each of these areas.
Reasonable people agree that the only way to achieve a goal is to set one. Thus the conventional wisdom of “If you don’t know where you’re going, you’ll never get there”.
With this wisdom in mind, Fix Trenton’s Budget and Majority for a Better Trenton have identified five areas in which the City of Trenton should manage to measurable goals.
- Crime Index reduction
- Population growth
- School success
- Average Income increase, and
- Economic success (as measured by ratable)
Most Trentonians would agree that if we did better in these five areas our lives would be better. However, try getting a politician to commit to a real goal for school success or average income. It’s never happened, at least not in Trenton and definitely not in Mayor Mack’s biennial report on the state of the city.
Imagine if instead of listing the number of grants we applied for, the Mayor reported on his plan to increase ratables by 10% to $2.1B or decrease our Crime Index from 3400 to 2000. You didn’t hear that because setting goals commits a politician to producing results and quite frankly, producing results is difficult.
That doesn’t mean the rest of us can’t have goals for our city and that we can’t force political action both at the ballot box and otherwise that will help us achieve them.
This report is meant to provide a status report on these five important measures thus setting the stage for efforts planned later in the year to set citizen goals for ourselves.
The current statistics are presented in order of importance. Notice that our most important goals are those that improve the economic health of the city. We can’t fix anything in Trenton unless we have a healthy economy.
Economic Success: D
In 2011 Trenton’s tax base, that is, the value of property on which we can charge a property tax, was $2,009,731,470. In 2012 it has declined to $1,961,049,170. This represents a 2.4% loss in ratable for the city.
The implications of this statistic are large. Our property tax rate will have to go up, again, in order to make up the difference. It means our economy is getting worse instead of better and most importantly, it means that our policies meant to stimulate economic growth are not working.
We can never have a lower tax rate or afford to spend more money on parks, police and streets unless our ratables go up.
Average Income: F
Trenton’s Median Household Income is $36,601; which stands in stark contrast to NJ’s Median household income which is almost double that of Trenton’s, $69,811.
Income levels are very important to the health of a city as they determine how much money residents will spend, which in turn, determines the attractiveness of our city to retailers and to entertainment producers. While NJ’s household income is double that of Trenton’s, per capita retail spending is three times our rate. This means that retail spending falls off disproportionately to income.
Making Trenton attractive to retail and entertainment business is important as the presence of those amenities make the city attractive to new residents.
School Success: F
The Trenton school district’s 2011 graduation rate was 47.7%. This means that over half of the students who entered 9th grade in 2007 graduated in 2011.
There is no world in which this is healthy. While it can be argued that fixing the schools isn’t a pre-requisite for revitalizing the city, after all the easiest target market for new residents are the millions of people without kids, failing schools don’t help.
With 50% of our young adult population grossly undereducated, they immediately become a drain on the economic future of our city. Furthermore, a significant portion of these kids will turn to crime and create both a public health threat to the rest of us and an expense in the form of police, courts and jails.
Moving this graduation rate up to 75% could theoretically halve our crime problem in the long run.
Population Growth : C
Trenton’s 2010 census numbers report a population of 84,913. Since 2000 our population has declined .6% while New Jersey’s has grown 4.5%. Relative to our neighbors, Trenton has become a less desirable place to live.
It will take an influx of new residents to begin the process of rebuilding our tax base. We have room to grow. At its peak in the 1920s, Trenton housed 140,000 residents.
Trenton’s crime problems have tracked the national trend downwards over the last decade. Uniform Crime Reports for 2011 show an increase in Index Crimes from to 3802 from 3744. That’s a 1.5% increase which shows we’re moving in the wrong direction by a bit.
Our city leaders have abdicated their responsibility to set positive goals for the city. Therefore it’s up to citizens to work together to set their own goals and to exert political force to make those goals stick and to construct a plan to meet them.
The Fix Trenton’s Budget committee created a multiple choice survey to assess the aptitude and policy perspective of Trenton’s municipal candidates. This was the committee’s major pre-election project. We hope it gives some perspective on the kinds of things that are necessary to fix the problem and the candidates who are most in tune with the correct solutions. Read the rest of this entry »
Political representation of Trenton’s South Ward was snatched from the hands of Trenton’s political machine three years ago by a smart and energetic Baptist minister. Reverend Coston was well educated, well read and well …. basically a decent guy.
Coston did much to initiate the Ward’s political renaissance through his efforts in organizing opposition to two ill-considered government funded housing projects in 2004. HUD’s Hope VI would have replaced the old Kearny homes project with another one and Leewood Village would have bulldozed 8 blocks of the South Ward in order to make room for subsidized fake colonial townhouses. Coston became president of the Lamberton Historic District Committee (LHDC) which hosted meetings that regularly drew 300 residents to the protests.
I bring up this bit of South Ward history to point to both what’s needed and what’s lacking in the crop of candidates hoping to fill Coston’s now vacated council spot. Read the rest of this entry »