Trenton Election

Reinvent Trenton’s 2018 Election Picks

May 3rd, 2018 |

Author: admin

It’s like a kiss of death when I support a candidate. The plain fact is that the vast majority of Trentonians aren’t in favor of actually doing the hard work to reinvent the city. If they were we would have never elected Tony Mack or Eric Jackson or Doug Palmer 5 times. It was obvious to anyone who really looked at those campaigns that they would never do what it takes to really improve the city.

I haven’t gotten involved in any of the campaigns this cycle for a number of personal reasons, but I still live here and I have written about economics in Trenton for many years. Therefore, it behooves me to say something about this campaign and in particular the relative likelihood that each of the candidates will move the economic needle.

I’d encourage readers to review the platforms of each candidate and consider that if a candidate can’t publish a plan then they probably don’t have one.

My Criteria

In years past, I’ve developed complicated issue by issue spreadsheets to evaluate candidate positions. I read all the web sites, read candidate questionnaires, went to candidate forums, etc. It occurs to me though that while all that is useful the decision can be a lot simpler.

Instead this cycle I’ve boiled it down of a few basic questions with associated positive or negative points.

Are they an Incumbent (-5 points): The last 18 years have been riddled with monumental government failures from using government money to build a bankrupt hotel, to corruption and now stolen payrolls and dirty water. Council members were charged with oversight through all of that. They have failed time and again to either notice when things were going wrong or know what to do to fix a problem. This includes people who’ve been on council before.

Support from Status Quo (-5 points): There are king-makers who have been shaping Trenton politics for many years. They’ve clearly not been shaping a good city. If a candidate is a product of these people, then they can’t be trusted to do the right things.

Are they supporting an incumbent (-3 points): A candidate who has the bad judgement to support an incumbent, can’t be trusted. We’ve simply had enough failure.

No Web Site (-3 points): My gosh if you can’t put up at least a basic page to say hello, what are you doing. This means you’re not really living in the 21^st century.

Focus on Homeowners (5 points): Homeownership in Trenton has declined 35% over the last 28 years. That’s what happens in a failed city. If a candidate doesn’t have their head around this then they shouldn’t be running for office.

New Governance Ideas (3 points): We clearly have a problem with how our city is run as evidenced by the poor annual report cards this site has given the city over the years. Does the candidate have any suggestion on how to improve governance?

Fleshed Out Platform online (3 points): Does they candidate thoughtfully address the important issues, especially the list of issues identified by the Fans of Trenton’s Irresponsible Blogger election group.

Follows Reinvent Trenton (2 points): I’m partial, but Reinvent Trenton has been discussing economic policy for a long time. Even if you don’t like the policy, to not be engaged enough in the discussion to keep up with the page means you’re not a serious policy candidate.

Tiebreak – I like them (1 point): I know most of the candidates so if there’s a tie, I’ll do what everyone does. Vote for who I like.

And now the races.

Mayor – Paul Perez

Think long and hard about what your expectation of a Mayoral candidate is. I have. I expect a thoughtful platform that explains how they will get good governance and improve the economy, especially how they will improve the attractiveness of Trenton to homeowners. I expect that the candidate assumes all voters are serious minded about policy and the important decision in from of them.

For the most part my review of this year’s candidates demonstrates a disregard for the intelligence of the voter.
Most web sites have very scant platitudes about the economy with limited policy ideas:

Reed Gusciora, Walker Worthy and Darren Green fall into this category with Reed at least saying something about downtown and promoting a resident incident line (which is sorely missing).

Some candidates have absolutely nothing to say: Annette Lartique and Alex Bethea are in this category. At least one has a website that doesn’t appear to work (can this be true?): Duncan Harrison’s site loads so slowly that its unusable.

And then there’s Paul Perez.
Paul and his team have written a book on economic development, linking issues with home ownership and rentals to the fundamental attractiveness of Trenton as an investment choice. They’ve created a treatise on good governance and took the time to research model governance that would be helpful

His web site deals with economic policy on how to fix abatements, some specific issues about downtown, our abandoned property policies and citizen engagement among other policy ideas. I was wrong when I said a couple of weeks ago that none of the candidates are addressing our decline in home ownership directly. Paul is.

Some of the other candidates mention good government and economics but compared to the detail and thoughtfulness Paul has put into his policy, the others look silly and trite.

Two of the candidates are incumbents and as such have presided over our failed government. Duncan Harrison is backed by the same person who backed Doug Palmer and gave us the failed city hotel. Walker Worthy is back by the Democratic establishment, including Doug Palmer, who have stood by and watched Trenton fail.

Paul, Darren and Reed have no obvious loyalties to Trenton’s political establishment.

It’s not close, Paul Perez is my strong recommendation for Mayor of Trenton.

Points	Total
Paul Perez	13
Darren Green	2
Reed Gusciora	0
Annette Horton-Lartigue	-3
Alex Bethea	-5
Walker Worthy Jr	-5
Duncan Harrison Jr	-8

At Large Council – Blakeley, Rodriguez, Montero,

You’ve got to pick three candidates and admittedly that was tough to do.

Over the years I’ve not seen eye to eye with Jerell Blakeley. Quite frankly he comes across as interested in something other than economic revitalization. He’s more of a “lift up the people” guy. My problem with that is, that without economic revitalization, who’s left to do the lifting.

That said, he checked a few boxes in my candidate criteria. He’s included a fair bit on policy, some of it good, some of it not so much (for instance, you have to be a Tier 1 city to collect a commuter tax). He does go in to good government issues which is great but he doesn’t address home ownership. He’s not an incumbent and as far as I know, no one’s pulling his strings.

After Jerrel it drops off dramatically and we immediately get in to bad candidates. Santiago Rodriguez doesn’t have a web site so that means he doesn’t have a platform. His one saving grace is that he actually follows Reinvent Trenton which has lots of policy ideas.

The next batch include two candidates that have used terrible judgement in supporting and co-campaigning with failed City Council President Zac Chester. Between Elvin Montero, Rachel Cogsville-Lattimer and Nathaniel McCray I had to pick one, so the tie went to Montero. He at least mentioned a few issues on his web site though it was in the most shallow of terms.

Points	Total
Jerell Blakeley	6
Santiago Rodriguez	-1
Elvin Montero	-2
Rachel Cogsville-Lattimer	-3
Nathaniel McCray	-3
Kathy McBride	-8

North Ward – Algernon Ward

I’ll vote in the North Ward and am very familiar with two of the candidates.

Marge is the incumbent and though she’s frequently been useful in constituent services, that’s just not the real role of a City Councilperson. Rather, it’s to oversee the administration. In that capacity she’s overseen failure after failure. She can blame it on others but she was there and the failures happened on her watch. Also, bizarrely, she doesn’t have a working web site so we don’t even know what kind of platform she’s pitching.

Algernon Ward is a geek. That’s a good thing. He’s a scientist and a history buff which you’ve got to love. He’s got positions listed on his web site but unhappily they’re also of the “lift up the people” variety and not “fix the city”. In fact, Algie once told me that he thinks corporations are evil and that he hopes that big business never relocates to Trenton. On the other-hand he worked with me on the “Fix Trenton’s Budget” group, so that’s good.

My criteria favors having written opinions and not being an incumbent. Algie’s an independent guy and also fairly experienced in Trenton politics.

Points	Total
Algernon Ward Jr	5
Eboni Love	-3
Marge Caldwell-Wilson*	-8

South Ward – Damian Malave

Although, I can’t imagine anyone outdoing George Muschal in constituent services, that’s not the real job. His Council (and he was Council President during the Mack years) was a failure in government oversight.

Neither Damian or Jenna say much useful on their web sites but at least they have them. Jenna, unhappily has joined up with the current President of the failed City Council, Zac Chester. This is a big knock against her and therefore pushed my vote to Damian Malave (if I lived in the South Ward).

Points	Total
Damian Malave	0
Jenna Kettenburg	-3
George Muschal*	-8

East Ward – Joe Harrison

None of the East Ward candidate web sites say much at all. That’s obviously a disappointment. However, two of the candidates do follow Reinvent Trenton which is like saying they at least get exposed to policy thinking. However, Taiwanda lied to me about her support for failed Council President Zac Chester. I was disappointed that she’s supporting him but really disappointed by the lie.

Trenton East Ward candidate called out for ‘lying’ about support of Chester

Joe Harrison has been participating in Trenton politics for a while and quite frankly would be a breath of fresh air on City Council.

Points	Total
Joseph Harrison	2
Perry Shaw III	0
Taiwanda Terry-Wilson	-1
Elmer Sandoval	-3

West Ward – Robin Vaughn

Obviously, the incumbent is out of the running. Two of the candidates don’t even trouble themselves to have a web site that might explain their platforms. Robin Vaughn and Atalaya Armstrong have web site but they fail to discuss issues at all.

That forced a tie. I give the nod to Robin because she’s at least dared to stick her toe in the hotbed of Trenton’s political policy discussion, the Facebook Group, Fans of Trenton’s Irresponsible Blogger. In that forum she’s gotten beaten up a bit for not being specific, but she’s still there and that’s a good sign.