Posts Tagged ‘Doug Palmer’
Citizen response to Palmer and Prunetti’s Op-Ed on Trenton redevelopment
Jane Jacobs is perhaps the most influential writer on urban redevelopment in our time. Her book, The Death and Life of Great American Cities, is a bible to many on what works and doesn’t in urban revitalization. In it, she argues that the infusion of large sums of government money into revitalization projects is cataclysmic. Instead, gradual money that ebbs and flows, fails and succeeds, is what is needed.
The very premise that a large infusion of government money into downtown Trenton will help, no matter how tempting, is fundamentally flawed. We don’t have to re-read Jacobs to understand this. Over $150,000,000 in government funds were spent in Trenton 20 years ago to build what Messer’s Palmer and Prunetti called the “Opportunity Triangle”: The ballpark, the arena and the hotel. The promise was that these large government investments (yes, our hotel was owned by the city) would stimulate other development in Trenton.
IT NEVER HAPPENED!
Palmer and Prunetti were wrong, way wrong. They proved how wrong politicians can be at great public expense (the hotel went bankrupt). Bob Prunetti, defended another government project, Thomas Edison State College’s development of Glen Gairn Arms site, by claiming that the patrons at the ballpark were stimulating development as late as 2014. There is no evidence of this at all. He was making up a conclusion that was not founded in fact. Palmer, as late as 2013 told me that he always wanted to sell the hotel to a private owner, yet he never did. After he left office, the hotel, that was built for $60,000,000, was sold in a fire sale for $5,000,000. Trenton taxpayers lost millions.
So why is it that the Trentonian thinks these two should have an audience regarding the use of public funds in Trenton redevelopment? (Guest Oped: Palmer and Prunetti: Trenton needs to follow successful examples from other cities)
They shouldn’t.
They had their chance and don’t have anything to show for it. In the 90s, when they were in power, the country grew economically while Trenton slid backward. They simply failed to position Trenton to ride the wave of growth that swept the country and therefore set the city up for the current trend in urban re-population.
Even one of the examples of success they reference in their Op-Ed, an expensive but uncompleted project in Atlantic City is dubious. A project that hasn’t even been completed can’t, by definition, be called an economic development success story. Spending money with no results isn’t success. Who would think otherwise?
Governor Christie’s plan for Trenton has already been roundly criticized by citizens that actually live and work in downtown Trenton. It’s a tone-deaf proposal that Ms. Jacobs would have railed against.
Prunetti and Palmer propose to change the investment a bit and morph it in to different mixed use project. However, this still represents a big, risky government directed project. It’s fundamentally predisposed to have cataclysmic results like stifling streetscapes, crowding out other projects or simply failing (like the hotel).
Who knows why these two former politicians decided to pitch this specific plan. Perhaps they are somehow connected to it? Perhaps they haven’t learned the lessons of cataclysmic government money and really think this will work? I don’t know. What I do know, and all rational Trentonians should know, is that their track record has been disastrous for Trenton. The Trentonian has done a disservice to Trenton in publishing their Op-Ed and giving it the credibility that comes with “print”.
Trenton is Missing Out on Big Business
If you’ve driven up the turnpike from Exit 7 to 8A then you’ve undoubtedly seen all of the giant distribution centers.
These are businesses that could have been located in Trenton if we’d gotten our act together.
One of the things you do as an aspiring civic leader in Trenton is go to workshops where you’re asked to list Trenton’s assets. People always give the same answers: its people, its buildings and its location.
Well our people are going to work on the turnpike corridor in places like East Windsor and Robbinsville, our buildings are empty and our location isn’t as good a one would have thought.
Instead Barnes and Noble, Green Mountain Coffee and likely Amazon along with many others have set up shop in modern warehouse space in the suburbs.
Before the apologist tell me that building new construction space is cheap and Trenton can’t compete, let me suggest that we didn’t even try. Doug Palmer was asleep at the wheel and Tony Mack is, well he’s Tony Mack.
The explosion in industry just 10 miles from downtown Trenton happened without our city even lifting a finger to figure out how we might be competitive.
We had at least one competitive advantage over the suburbs. Those warehouse facilities are hiring Trenton people. The Kenco facility that houses Green Mountain Coffee are actually bussing Trentonians to Robbinsville.
What went wrong?
My guess is that the views on business among the city leadership are simply too provincial to understand what was happening. Additionally our culture of corporate extortion limits us to dealing with small time developers. Serious logistics companies like Kenco wouldn’t give a trifling crook like Tony Mack the time of day.
Furthermore we just don’t have a good story to tell. To attract a 500,000 SF logistics operation we’d need to show why Trenton is a less costly option than a “Greenfield” in Robbinsville. We’d have needed all the creative business people we could muster to pull that story together. A difficult task indeed, but we didn’t even make a serious effort.
Trenton misses out on opportunities like this because we are distracted from the job of revitalizing our city. Instead of attracting world class development, we’re busy playing political games to attract housing projects like HOPE VI. We spend our days begging for money through grant writing and we reshuffle the deck chairs in our city budget.
I don’t expect Trenton to develop a plan in the next two years. Rather we’ll need to wait until a new administration is elected. In the meantime, we need to listen for candidates who have a “can do“attitude about engaging the city in developing a real revitalization plan.